This article, designed for practitioners and prepared for the General Practice Institute at Baylor University Law School, April, 2014, discusses the drafting and practice implications and requirements of the new Estates Code that went into effect on January 1, 2014. It discusses both changed and new provisions that significantly affect choices about planning and choices about estate administration under the provisions of the Code.
Updated for presentation to the Collin County Probate Bar Association in April, 2014, this outline provides a discussion off planning lessons in both estate and business planning contexts. (See description below.)
Prepared for the 2011 General Practice Institute sponsored by Baylor Law School and the General Practice and Solo section of the state bar, this outline provides a discussion off planning lessons in both estate and business planning contexts. From the introduction: The hope present when doing most legal planning is that there will be no resulting litigation. Often it is assumed that validly executed documents and an appropriate legal structure are sufficient concerns of the lawyer involved. As I have been in practice longer, and have recently become increasingly involved in litigation both as an advocate and as an expert, it has become apparent that limiting concerns to those narrow areas is not sufficient. It is also essential that the practitioner identify the possibility and likelihood of conflict arising from the transaction under consideration and take appropriate action where there is a context indicating a high probability of later conflict.
In the news: Sibling Agreements: Dallas Morning News, March 8, 2007
This commentary on proposed Congressional redistricting was prepared for broadcast on KERA 90.1 Radio, Dallas, Texas. July 21, 2005.
This commentary on proposed Congressional redistricting was prepared for broadcast on KERA 90.1 Radio, Dallas, Texas. October 5, 2004.
This commentary on proposed Congressional redistricting was prepared for broadcast on KERA 90.1 Radio, Dallas, Texas. July 9, 2003.
This brief article provides a checklist of considerations in closing a going business. It was prepared for inclusion in the Japan Yellow Pages information section. December, 1998.
This outline provides an overview of basic estate planning substantive law, and a practical discussion of the strategies, tools, and techniques appropriate to solving both typical and special estate planning problems sometimes encountered by lawyers in solo and small practice environments planning their own estate. It was prepared for use in a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association Solo and Small Practice Section. December, 1997.
Written for use with non-lawyer groups, this article answers frequently asked questions regarding lifetime planning, Wills, and Trust. In addition, it suggests other considerations that may require attention by those doing planning. September, 1997, updated December 2001.
While there are many resources which provide technical guidance
on the particular requirements of individual estate planning
tools and techniques, few approach the problems of estate planning
from the perspective of how to choose, combine, and use tools
appropriate to the needs of particular clients. This outline
provides one analytic pattern for such decision-making. It states
a working definition of estate planning, discusses obstacles
which must be considered by the attorney providing estate planning
advice, if the advice is to fully meet the needs (both perceived
and unacknowledged) of the client, and provides a step-by-step
approach to choosing and using tools appropriate to the clients
A working knowledge of the law of Wills, trusts, probate, business entities, real property, donative transfers, income taxation, and transfer taxation is assumed, since these form the foundation of the estate planning and probate practice. Accordingly, this outline focuses on the problems and opportunities presented by the characteristics and interactions of these fundamental areas.
Prepared in conjunction with a presentation for the 1993 Wills, Probate, and Alternatives course of the State Bar of Texas Professional Development Program.
This brief article considers the role and function of the
mediator, and how the mediator may effectively use risk to work
to resolution of a dispute.
Prepared for use as supplemental materials for a presentation to the Texas Woman's University Continuing Education Program 40 Hour Civil Mediation Course, January, 1999.
The past decade has brought a substantial growth in the use
of alternative dispute resolution procedures as either a supplement
to or replacement for litigation, particularly mediation. This
development has followed two separate tracks which are now converging.
First, lawyers and litigants alike perceived a need to make dispute
resolution less costly in time and expense. Second, non-legal
professionals sought a dispute resolution mechanism with less
psychological cost to the disputants. Each of these threads brings
specific, sometime conflicting, demands and priorities into this
maturing area of practice. To perform effectively, the advocate
must understand the roles of the disputants and advocates in
that process, the mediation process, and the special strategic
and tactical considerations which should be taken into account
to effectively perform as an advocate. This outline focuses on
two areas: first, an examination of the strong tensions resulting
from the interplay between the ethical obligations of attorney
as advocate and the mediation process; second, practical suggestions
regarding preparation and participation as an effective advocate
in the mediation process in the context of those tensions.
Prepared for presentation to the Dallas Bar Association Probate, Trust, and Estate Section, October 1997.
This outline considers the meaning of the term "practice
of law," and its implications for mediation by non-lawyers,
particularly when litigants or potential litigants appear pro
se. It then offers some practical suggestions regarding measures
which might be taken by a non-lawyer mediator to minimize the
risk of allegations of the unauthorized practice of law.
Prepared in conjunction with a presentation to the Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution (SPIDR) Dallas Chapter, September, 1997.
This article discusses a formalized understanding of the process of legal analysis. Prepared for class use in law school Property classes, 1993-1996.